Kurt is engaged to a highschooler. And not just a highschooler. Hes engaged to blaine the boy who needs a puppet to talk to whenever kurts not around.
This makes Kurt seem creepy as fuck. If basically their relationship makes Blaine revert…
I think the OP has forgotten that Blaine is 18 now and legally an adult- so any choices or decisions he makes he makes completely outside of Kurt’s or anyone’s persuasion. I wish people would stop fucking up the actual meaning of the word ‘pedophile’.
teen wolf 3A bloopers.
My cat is trying to sleep under the desk lamp like he’s a lizard.
He’s forgotten how to cat.
HAHAHA IT WAS NICE KNOWING YOU FRIENDS!!!!
Because it’s a proven fact that bisexuals only exist to cheat on their same-sex partners with opposite-sex partners and steal all your shit.
I need to work on my thievery then. Level up or something.
Those gifs are perfection. I agree with you btw.
Thanks. I’m just really fed up with the hypocrisy. Like, why aren’t there more posts about what happened to Kurt? Why aren’t there more posts about how he got screwed over by the show AGAIN? Why isn’t there more outrage that Cody was said/implied to be bisexual and they write him as a creep?
The Backlot 5x08 recap (x)
Again, where was this outrage when Kurt was saying “no” and “stop” to his boyfriend at the back of a car and the said boyfriend wouldn’t stop at first? Kurt had to extract himself out of the car, shout so loud his voice resonated in the parking lot, only to face an angry boyfriend. He then apologized first to proposed sex the day after, yet they think it’s perfectly normal.
I genuinely don’t understand how they can criticize this and call it sexual assault; sure it was wrong, and not think that what blarren did, which most definitely correspond the definition of sexual assault, wasn’t problematic? Just because they want to think that blarren is the perfect boyfriend for kurt, when he isn’t. If this shocks them, then the car scene should’ve shocked them ten times more, kurt was so distressed in that scene, yet he was supposed to trust blarren. I don’t understand. (via colferbittersweetjazz)
I’m curious how the Backlot reacted when The First Time aired. Or about that episode since then.
I bet not. Heather Hogan thinks neither Blaine nor Santana can do anything wrong
I’m only reblogging this to say what the fuck? Fucking forget what Blaine did for a moment here- judge the scenes between Cody and Kurt on their own context, and it’s still fucking wrong. What Blaine did was wrong, what Cody did was wrong- arguing that Blaine did ~more wrong~ doesn’t trump Cody’s awfulness. This isn’t a fucking contest.
Way to miss the point on purpose. I wasn’t trying to make it into a competition, on the contrary, I was saying, if you think what Cody did is bad, then how come you didn’t think that blarren sexually assaulting kurt was bad either? See? It’s as simple as that. Yet, When kurt said “no” after role playing with shirtless santa, the guy didn’t kept groping kurt, he tied him up, not to rape him, but to rob him.
Still, no one is asking Kurt to date shirtless santa after that, are we? if the character comes back tomorrow and tries to woo kurt, I would be offended, the same way I was when quickly after the sexual assault (since you guys never hesitate to throw names, I might as well call by it’s name something that correspond to the definition) blarren sexually assaulted kurt, I was surprised that no one said things like “awful” and “sexual assault” and that no one was outraged that kurt had to apologize first.
What the guy did was wrong, it’s a fact, it’s clear, it’s out there. The sillyness of the scene, due to the decoration and stuff, doesn’t make anybody goes, well, that guy isn’t that bad. But what blarren did was never properly addressed and the pairing remains this romantic relationship for some when the guy sexually assaulted his boyfriend so they would lose their virginity at the back of a car. If people are able to be outraged at shirtless santa’s behavior, then they should feel the SAME about what happened with blarren. Yet, you have two assholes; one is still good boyfriend material, when the other is not.
There is no competition for me; none of them is a good boyfriend material for kurt.
You seem to be under the mistaken belief that I support Klaine now or back during season three. I don’t and I didn’t.
I’m not saying that people shouldn’t be outraged over what Blaine did- I was and continue to be outraged by it- or that it isn’t awful that there wasn’t more media outrage over TFT. I’m saying that not every fucking post about what Cody did needs to be strawmaned with paragraphs about what Blaine did. I’ve seen (agreed with, made, reblogged!) anti-klaine posts about how it’s awful for people to call the car scene hot or to reblog them to flail over their couple when the context is so awful and I’ve seen those same blogs reblogging gifs of Kurt tied up in his underwear after being found by Rachel and Santana.
Any conversation about how awful the last episode was keeps getting derailed with ‘WELL IF YOU WEREN’T AS OUTRAGED ABOUT BLAINE~ HOW CAN YOU JUDGE THIS”. You don’t get to decide that someone can’t be upset about what Cody did.
And I have seen posts where people have said they’d rather Kurt date Cody than Blaine. Only one or two but they’re still circulating.
You know what I also keep seeing? “Well, I don’t think it was a sexual assault so I don’t know how you can- BUT WHAT ABOUT WHAT BLAINE DID??” Well good for you, and good for those people but anyone who feels differently, anyone who’s been a similar position are left black-listing words like ‘santa’ and fucking ‘hula hoops’ to not have to see people de-legitimatizing their absolute discomfort with that episode and watch it be used as another notch in the anti-blaine anderson argument.
And let’s not fucking kid ourselves here- HH was writing about Klaine in a positive light during the start of season three because that’s what she was getting paid to do. The more Glee’s ratings plummet, the more she gets to wail on the show. At the end of the day, she’s catering to the fans just as much as she needs to, to get traffic on her articles.
IT’S BEEN 64 YEARS. DID YOU MISS THE MEMO???
omg i think you just assumed i was a klainer
this must happen to every anti-Klainer at least once.
It was a really condescending response too. This week is like the frigging Twilight Zone for me.
eira-cannaid said:*blinkblink* Um, okay, wow. I admit, I went looking. Lot of point missing there. O.o I’m tempted myself to reblog and comment. I guess it’s a matter of how much wank you are willing to get pulled into potentially. *hugs*
Ugh, a part of me is frustrated enough to mess the wings of my eyeliner up (argh) and the rest of me just doesn’t want to be one of those wank-baiters.
eira-cannaid said:It does seem that any discussions regarding Cody have degenerated into Klainer vs non-Klainer =/ (Assuming, of course, your anon was on that subject) I would ignore.
Not an anon, this person reblogged my last post with the great big steaming assumption I shipped klaine and wasn’t outraged at The Car Scene.
How has this happened to me?